|
Chapter
5 |
|
SINGLE VARIABLE
SEARCH TECHNIQUES
Problems 5.1 to 5.5 | Problems
5.6 to 5.10 | Problems 5.11 to 5.14
problem5.1 | problem5.2
| problem5.3 | problem5.4 | problem5.5
5-1.
In Figure 5-10, the profit function is given for a sulfuric acid alkylation
reactor as a function of feed rate and catalyst concentration. Plot the
profit function as a function of feed rate for a constant catalyst concentration
of 95%. Place six golden section experiments on the interval giving their
location, the corresponding value of the profit function and the length
and location of the final interval of uncertainty.

Solution:
The function to be maximized is shown on
p. 5-2. Equation (5-53) is used to compute the final interval I6,
and equations (5-51) and (5-52) are used to compute the location of the
first two points.

n = 6,
t
= 1.618 and Io = 15

x1 = 0.382 Io
equation (5-52)
x1 = 5 + 0.382(15) = 10.729
x2 = 0.618 Io
equation (5-51)
x2 = 5 + 0.618(15) = 14.271
The location of x1 and x2
are shown on the following page.
The search proceeds as follows and is
shown on the diagram seen here.
x1 = 10.729
y(x1) = 147
x2 = 14.271
y(x2) = 100, eliminate > 14.27
x3 = 14.271 - (10.279 - 5)
= 8.542
y(x3) = 125, eliminate < 8.542
x4 = 8.542 + (14.271 - 10.729)
= 12.084 y(x4) = 130, eliminate
> 12.084
x5 = 12.084 - (10.729 - 8.542)
= 9.897 y(x5)
= 149, eliminate > 10.729
x6 = 10.729 - (9.897 - 8.542)
= 9.374
y(x6) = 147, eliminate < 9.374
y(x5) = 149, is the maximum
value which is on the interval 9.374 < x* <
10.729.
top
5-2. Show that
equation (5-43) for x2 can be put in the following form in
terms of = Io .
x2 = [1 + Î(An-1
- An-2An+1/An)] (An/An+1)
Io
Solution:
From equation (5-43)
x2 = I2 = AnIn
- ÎAn-2
Io
Using equation (5-41)
In = [(1 + ÎAn-1)/An+1]
Io
x2 = An[(1 + ÎAn-1)/An+1]
Io - ÎAn-2
Io
= [An/An+1
(1 + ÎAn-1)
Io - ÎAn-2
Io]
= [1 + ÎAn-1
- ÎAn-2
(An+1/An)] (An/An+1) Io
and x2 = [1 + Î(An-1
- An-2An+1/An)] (An/An+1)
Io
top
5-3. Derive equation
(5-65) from equation (5-64).
Obtain equation (5-65)

from equation (5-64)

Solution:
The matrix of coefficients are known values
from experiments placed at y(x1) = y1, y(x2)
= y2 and y(x3) = y3. Thus, the values
of a and b can be determined by Cramer's rule for use in the following
equation for the optimum (stationary point) x* of a single
variable quadratic equation (y = ax2 + bx + c).
x*= - b/2a
Cramer's rule is:
a = Da/D and b = Db/D



x* = -b/2a = -(Db/D)/(2Da/D)
= -Db/2Da
Substituting for Da and Db
gives:

which is equation (5-65).
top
5-4. Compare the
final intervals of uncertainty (initial being 1.0) for simultaneous elimination,
Fibonacci search and golden section search using 2, 5 and 10 experiments.
Assume perfect resolution. Give conclusions from this conclusion.
Solution:
Compare simultaneous elimination, Fibonacci
search and golden section search for n = 2, 5, 10.
For simultaneous elimination, equation
(5-29) is applicable for an even number of experiments, and for perfect
resolution this equation is:

This equation is also applicable for an
odd number of experiments. (See equation (5-30).) Substituting for values
of n = 2, 5 and 10 with Io = 1 gives:
n = 2
p = 1 I*2
= 1/2
n = 5
p = 2 I*5
= 1/3
n = 10 p
= 5 I*10
= 1/6
For Fibonacci search equation (5-40) is
applicable, and for perfect resolution d
= 0 to give:
In = Io/An+1
Substituting for values of n with Io
= 1 gives:
n = 2
A3 = 2
I2 = 1/2 = 0.5
n = 5
A6 = 8
I5 = 1/8 = 0.125
n = 10 A11
= 89 I10 = 1/89 = 0.0122
For Golden Section search equation (5-53)
is applicable and is:
In = Io/tn+1
Substituting for values of n with Io
= 1 gives:
n = 2
I2 = 1/1.618 = 0.618
n = 5
I5 = 1/(1.618)4 = 0.1455
n = 10 I10
= 1/(1.618)9 = 0.0135
For comparison, the above results are tabulated
below.

As seen in the above table, simultaneous
search and Fibonacci search have the same final interval for two experiments,
but golden section search's interval is larger. Both Fibonacci search
and golden section search are more efficient than simultaneous search
for five and ten experiments, and Fibonacci search is only 8% better than
golden section search for ten experiments.
top
5-5. Compare the
anticipated performance of Fibonacci search and the quadratic method for
the following types of unimodal, single variable functions: quadratic,
continous, arbitrary and discrete.
Solution:
| Function |
Fibonacci
Search |
Quadratic
Method |
1.
Quadratic

|
Moves
to optimum rapidly eliminating section that do not contain the optimum.
In 11 experiments, the optimum is located in a line segment that is
1/144 the length of the original interval. |
Locates
the optimum in one applicationof the method, if the starting point
is sufficiently close to the optimum. |
2.
Continous

|
Same
as above. |
Proceeds
to the optimum at some rate determined by the form of the function
if not confounded by a discontinous first derivative. |
3.
Arbitrary

|
Same
as above. |
Quadratic
Search is not applicable if the function is discontinous which gives
discontinous first derivatives required by the method. |
4.
Discrete

|
Latticesearch
version of Fibonnacci search may require adding fictitious points
which will reduce search effectiveness. |
Quadratic
search is not applicable if the function is not continous. However,
it may be modified but with difficulty. |
|